Ex -IRA MAN LOSES BID FOR ‘IMMUNITY’ AGAINST CONVICTION

‘ We consider that any of the grounds of appeal haveAssemblyde out – Lord Chief Justice Declan Morgan.

941995_511917538856166_1518325142_n

A FORMER IRA man’s bid to overturn his conviction for attempted murder has been rejected. Lawyers for Co Tyrone man Gerry McGeough said he had been assured immunity from prosecution by a Sinn Fein representative.

The lawyers argued that criminal proceedings that led to McGeough being jailed for trying to kill part-time soldier Samuel Brush 32 years ago were an abuse of process. Central to his case was an allegation that North Belfast assembly member Gerry Kelly, pictured below, had assured McGeough in 2000 that he would not be charged if he returned to the North from being on the run. McGeough had escaped from hospital after being wonded when his victim – now a DUP councillor – returned fire in the ambush. He cotended that Mr Kelly had given him a binding primise on behalf of the Stormont executive.

Gerry Kelly

Lord Chief Justice Declan Morgan pointed to legal authorites which set out that an abuse of process depended on an unequivocal guarantee of immunity being by those bringing the criminal case. ” We do not consider that the evidence indicates any basis for the conclusion that Mr Kelly was a represntative of verdict and esponsible forhonduct of the investigation or prosecutions, ” the judge said. “We further agree that in any event the statement attributed to Mr Kelly, who did not give evidence, did not contain any representation, never mind one which could be said to be unequivocal for the purpose of this test.” Mr Brush was working as a postman when he was shot and seriously wonded near Aughnacloy, Co Tyrone in June 1981. McGeough (54), from Dungannon, was convicted in 2011 of attempted murder, possession of firearms with intent to commit an indictable offence and IRA membership. He was jailed for 20 years but released earlier  this year under the terms of the Good Friday Agreement. The one-time gunrunner was not in court yesterday to hear judges throw out all grounds of the appeal. Correspondence from the Northern Ireland Office to Mr Kelly in 2003 was introudeced during the case. The letter included McGeough in a list of six people who would face arrest and questioning if they returned to the North of Ireland.

As part of a disclosure process evidence was also called from William Smyth of the Progressive Unionist Party. He claimed to have attended a meeting with former Secretary of State Mo Mowlam during negotiations leading up to the Good Friday Agreement in 1998. It was alleged that she had confirmed that those who had committed offences during the Troubles for which they had not been convicted would not be prosecuted. Mr Smyth also stated that those who came forward to admit their crimes would serve two years in jail while those who refused to accept guilt would apparenty face no punishment. Sir Declan, sitting with Lords Justices Higgins and Girvan, said : “Such an outcome would be absurd. “The learned disclosure judge concluded, in our veiw inevitabilty, that Mr Smyth’s evidence that the issue of on-the-runs was ‘done and dusted’ was difficult to accept.” MrGeough also failed to establish that it was unfair to try him because of the passage of time. Detailing his escape from hospital, subsequent proceedings against him in continental Europe and the US and a period spent in the Republic, Sir Declan held that any delay in the trail was McGeough’s responsibility. “We do not consider that any of the grounds of appeal have been made out and we do not consider the convictions are unsafe,” the judge said. Mr Brush was in court for the virdict and later said he had been under no doubt the appeal would be thrown out. Dismissing McGeough’s claims to have been assured immunity, Mr Brush said : “We ars living in a fairytale land as it but to suggest that was going to take place is even worhorse .” The DUP councillor also hit out the founding being given to bring the challenge. “As far as I can see it’s another scandalous misuse of the legal aid system. It had no chance of success,” he said.

With many thanksis to : The Irish News.

McGeough status update:

POLITICAL HOSTAGE !A Judge ruled yesterday that NIPS must review its decision to refuse permission, and set out a range of factors that NIPS must take into account. In light of his comments NIPS withdrew original letter to Mr McGeough which explained why his application had been refused and replaced it this morning with a further letter which addressed fully all the points that the judge had asked NIPS to cover. In these circumstances Mr Justice Stephens took the view that the original case had been overtaken by events and that if the new decision letter was to be challenged there would need to be fresh proceedings. The decision to refuse therefore stands.

POSTED ON BEHALF OF : Helen McClafferty

A PUBLIC MEETING ON THE ONGOING TORTURE OF MARIAN PRICE

A PUBLIC MEETING ON THE ONGOING TORTURE OF MARIAN PRICE

 
 
Thursday, 8 March 2012

POSTED ON BEHALF OF : Public event · By Brenda Downes and Martine Jackson

A PUBLIC MEETING ON THE ONGOING TORTURE OF MARIAN PRICE

The date for this public meeting is also ”International Women’s Day” Please make the effort to attend ..

 Related articles

Ex-IRA man ‘not treated fairly’

former IRA man seeking a Royal pardon after being jailed for the attempted murder of a unionist councillor has not been treated fairly, the High Court has heard.

Gerry McGeough was handed a 20 year sentence last year for shooting off-duty UDR soldier in Samuel Brush in 1981.

But lawyers for McGeough claimed he was being treated differently to other so-called political prisoners because he is no longer a member of Sinn Féin.

The 53-year-old was convicted of attempted murder, possession of a gun and ammunition and IRA membership, 30 years after the attack on Mr Brush.

McGeough’s victim was working as a postman and making a delivery near Aughnacloy when he was attacked.

Under the terms of the Good Friday Agreement he is expected to serve only two years of his sentence.

If he fails to win a judicial review he is still due for release in April next year.

Mr Brush, now a Democratic Unionist councillor in Dungannon, was in court to hear submissions on behalf of the man convicted of trying to kill him.

It was argued that the Royal Prerogative of Mercy should be granted to ensure equal treatment with other convicted terrorists who benefited from it.

A judge was told the warrant was used to free others such as James McArdle, the Armagh man responsible for the 1996 London Docklands bombing.

Sean Devine, counsel for McGeough, said: “What seems to be the elephant in the room is this was a political device were political motives effectively seemed to trump the legal framework that was in place.”

STOP POLITICIAL POLICING

He stressed that no criticism was being made of it, adding that some consequences of the political process and Good Friday Agreement were “distasteful”.

One of those was that some men convicted of atrocities prior to the peace accord were being released after as little as two years in jail, the court heard.

“There are people, for example, who have committed sectarian massacres in the mid-1990s who benefited from the Good Friday Agreement,” Mr Devine said.

He claimed it was “equally distasteful that because the Good Friday Agreement is in the bag and because Mr McGeough is no longer a member of Sinn Féin and perhaps seen to be more vulnerable” that he should receive unequal treatment.

Part of McGeough’s case is that it would be unlawful to draw a distinction between him and others because he previously served jail terms in Germany and in the United States.

Mr Devine added: “The logic applied by the authorities to achieve what they considered the right result in this case was, we say, twisted and tortuous.”

According to his argument McGeough should not have served any time for the attempted murder.

The judge, Mr Justice Treacy, remarked: “I have to say I find that a startling proposition.”

Tony McGleenan QC, responding for the Secretary of State, argued that there were “categoric” differences in McArdle’s case.

“He, looked at in the round, was in custody for a period of time that would have taken him beyond the two-year threshold,” Mr McGleenan said.

“But because of the way he was arrested and charged he was technically not going to qualify.

“That’s not Mr McGeough’s case, it’s a very long way from it.”

Judgement in the judicial review application was reserved on Friday.

Statment released by Helen McClaffertyon behalf of Gerry McGeough. 

McGeough was arrested because he ran as an ‘Independent” in the 2007 Assembly elections. Gerry left SF due to the party’s pro-abortion stand. He put himself through university and was the editor of The Hibernian Magazine for God and Country. He was living openly with his wife and 4 children in Tyrone at the time of his arrest. The ‘spin’ the media gives on Sammy Brush’s ‘innocents’ is pathetic. E…ven the British government acknowledged there were members of the UDR who were also members in the UDA aka UFF.Gerry arrest and incarceration is purely politically motivated. You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to see that. Just the way his whole case has played out tells you ‘dirty politics’ at play.

Related articles

BBC Reply to my letter – “BBC Lift the Media Ban on Gerry McGeough’s Case”

BBC Broadcasting House, Belfast

11 November, 2011

Ms Helen McClafferty

 

Dear Helen

Complaint – BBC News

 

 

 

I’m replying to your complaint about coverage of the case of Gerry McGeough by the BBC’s news services. You suggest that there is a “media blackout” around reporting of this case and allege that the BBC is abiding by it.  

To the best of our knowledge, there are no restrictions surrounding the reporting of this case, and the BBC is certainly not operating under any form of media embargo or blackout.

BBCNI’s local news services have reported on this story on several occasions in recent months. We reported on Mr McGeough’s sentencing in April of this year and have also reported on his successful application for judicial review and his bid to obtain a Royal Prerogative of Mercy. We have not been made aware of any deterioration in Mr McGeough’s state of health.

The news stories covered by BBC news services are based on sound editorial judgements, which include an assessment of whether publication reflects new information. Should you learn of any further developments in relation to Mr McGeough’s health, please feel free to contact our Fermanagh district journalist, Julian Fowler, by email at julian.fowler@bbc.co.uk.      

I hope that this is useful. 

Yours sincerely

Michael Cairns

Head of Newsgathering & Political Programmes – BBCNI

 Posted for and on behalf of :  by Helen McClafferty on Saturday, 12 November 2011 at 14:06

Antonia Gordon

total LIES !! they have a blackout on all POW case, they are allowed to say certain facts that the GOVERNEMENT has controlled to be allowed through, why is there never any mention of how ill Gerry is ?!, when it was Brendan Lillis why never… say he was that ill he nearly DIED !! why when its Marian Price dnt the world know she is in an all male prison ?!?!?! BBC – SHAME SHAME SHAME !! everyone should mass email a complaint !!!!