Tag: Middle East

‘Neil Mackay: If Afghan death-squad claims are proven the SAS must be disbanded and those guilty jailed for life for war crimes ‘.

http://seachranaidhe-irishandproud.blogspot.com/2022/07/neil-mackay-if-afghan-death-squad.html

This is not a flag is a blood-soacked Butchers Apron

Isis missile strike injures two British SAS soldiers fighting in Syria against Assad government forces

The men were fighting with the Syrian Democratic Forces in two towns east of the River Euphrates

The men were fighting with anti-government Syrian Democratic Forces (who are Kurdish based) in two towns east of the river Euphrates DELIL SULEIMAN/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

Two SAS soldiers seriously injured in Syria were hit as Islamic State militants counterattacked in one of their last two strongholds.

The two men were embedded with the Syrian Democratic Forces, Britain and America’s local allies in eastern Syria, as they attacked the Isis-held town of al-Shaafa.

A local fighter, a Kurd from the YPG militia, which dominates the Syrian Democratic Forces, was killed when an Isis unit fired what local commanders said was a heat-seeking missile at the group on Saturday morning.

One SAS soldier received a serious injury to his throat, while the other suffered lesser injuries. Both were taken to a field hospital at the nearby al-Omar oilfield and flown by helicopter to an unnamed US-run military base for hospital treatment.

The Times understands that neither Briton is in a critical condition and both are expected to survive. The Ministry of Defence would not discuss their condition, saying that it did not comment on special forces operations. Neither man has been named.

The two men are among several hundred members of British, American, French and other western special forces fighting alongside the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in eastern Syria against the remnants of Isis. The militants are surrounded in two towns east of the River Euphrates in Deir Ezzor province, al-Shaafa and al-Susah. Al-Shaafa has been the scene of intense fighting for a week, and inroads have been made against Isis, with up to half the town seized, according to local journalists.

Kamiran Sadoun, a Syrian Kurdish journalist who was in the area at the time, said that there had been five to seven SAS soldiers on patrol with SDF fighters when the clash happened. He said that he had spoken to wounded SDF soldiers at the al-Omar field hospital.“They told us they were attacked — they shot at the Isis fighters then they fired back with a thermal missile,” he told The Times. He said that besides the fighter who was killed, two more were injured.

There have been heavy coalition air strikes, including one on Friday that was said to have killed 11 civilians, among them a Russian woman and her child. Thousands more civilians have fled the area.

The death of the Kurdish fighter and the two Britons’ injuries will be used to highlight a clash between Britain and America over plans for the region. Last month President Trump announced that he would withdraw all 2,000 American troops operating in Syria. The move, contradicting a policy he announced last summer to keep American troops in Syria to ensure Isis remained defeated and to maintain a bulwark against Iranian influence, prompted fierce criticism across the West and was followed by James Mattis, US defence secretary, announcing his resignation. British politicians argued that Isis was “not yet defeated” and Gavin Williamson, the defence secretary, said that it was necessary to “keep a foot on the throat”.

No timetable for the withdrawal has been given, although Mr Trump’s initial demand that it be within 30 days has been discounted.

A senior British defence source said yesterday: “This attack goes to show that the fight against Daesh is by no means over. There’s a question now over whether Daesh are ramping up their operations ahead of the US troop withdrawal to ‘prove’ that they drove American forces out. It could be similar to what the Taliban tried to do in Helmand in Afghanistan.”

With many thanks to: The Times/ The Sunday Times for the original story

US judge rules against Saudi Arabia in Sep. 11 case

A handout picture provided by the Saudi Royal Palace on March 27, 2018, shows Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman meeting with the United Nations Secretary-General (unseen) at the United Nations headquarters in New York.

A US judge has ruled against Saudi Arabia’s bid to dismiss lawsuits, asserting that the monarchy must pay billions of dollars in damages as it helped plan the September 11, 2001, attacks.

US District Judge George Daniels said in Manhattan, New York, on Wednesday that the plaintiffs’ allegations “narrowly articulate a reasonable basis,” Reuters reported.

Daniels has been tasked to oversee litigation against Riyadh by the families of those killed, some 25,000 people injured, and numerous businesses.

PressTV-Saudi govt. may have funded 9/11 ‘dry run’: New data
The lawsuit alleges that the Saudi embassy in Washington paid for two Saudi nationals to fly from the city of Phoenix to Washington “in a dry run for the 9/11 attacks.”
“We’re delighted that Judge Daniels denied Saudi Arabia’s motion to dismiss,” James Kreindler, a lawyer for many of the plaintiffs, said in a phone interview. “We have been pressing to proceed with the case and conduct discovery from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, so that the full story can come to light, and expose the Saudi role in the 9/11 attacks.”

The kingdom has denied having played any role in the deadly attacks.

Saudi asks US judge to drop 9/11 lawsuits
US court clears Saudi, blames Iran for 9/11
Some 3,000 people died in the 9/11 attacks, after four hijacked passenger planes were crashed into the World Trade Center in New York, the Pentagon and a Pennsylvania field. Fifteen of the 19 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia.

In several cases, hundreds of victims’ relatives and injured survivors, along with insurance companies and businesses say, the Saudi government assisted the attacks through a variety of activities in support of al-Qaeda over a number of years.

With many thanks to: PressTV for the origional story.

Red Cross to chair forum seeking solution to Maghaberry dispute.

Red Cross to chair forum seeking solution to Maghaberry dispute.

THE International Committee of the Red Cross has agreed to chair a prison forum involving republican inmates in a bid to ease tensions at a Co Antrim jail.

The Red Cross took on the role after being asked by justice minister David Ford and receiving the backing of republican prisoners in Maghaberry. The involvement of the internationally recognised humanitarian organisation comes after years of conflict at the high security prison. The establishment of the forum was recommended by an independent ‘stocktake’ published last year. However, republican inmates refused to take part in the forum after a former member of the prison’s Board of Visitors, Tom Millar, was appointed as chairman without consultation. It is understood both prisoners and senior jail officials will take part in the forum which will discuss the stocktake. Republican prisoners are currently held in the prison’s Roe Four and Roe Three landings. The forum will be chaired by Geoff Loane, who is the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) head of office in Belfast. “The ICRC believes such a role fits within the organisation’s humanitarian mandate and is compatible with its fundamental principles of neutrality, independence and impartiality,” he said.
“After having consulted on this matter, the ICRC accepted the position of chair for a six-month period on the basis that all parties to the forum agree to the ICRC taking up the role. He said the forum is “now addressing substantive issues on the basis of an agreed agenda.” In the past Mr Loane has overseen ICRC visits to the US-run Guantanamo Bay. He has also worked in conflict zones including the Balkans, Middle East and the Horn of Africa. The Red Cross has been active in the North of Ireland since the 1950s and undertook prison visits until 1999, a year after the Good Friday Agreement (GFA) was signed. The Geneva-based organisation set up a full-time office in Belfast in 2011. Last year’s stocktake was carried out by an independent assessment team appointment by justice minister David Ford to look at a deal struck in 2010 to relax strip searches and controlled movement in the prison. Republicans claim that authorities have failed to implement the 2010 agreement. They also say that prison chiefs have failed to act on the last year’s stocktake. In 2012 republican prisoners ended a no-wash protest weeks after prison officer David Black was shot dead by the ‘IRA’ as he travelled to work at Maghaberry prison along the M1 Motorway. Tensions in the jail boiled over earlier this year after prisoners claimed that movement was restricted during building work. Last week republicans held protests after claims that two inmates were forcibly moved from their cells. A spokesman for the DoJ said: “The minister of justice has asked the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) to act as independent chair to the prisoners forums for separated prisoners. “The ICRC has agreed to this request in its neutral and impartial role.” Mandy Duffy from the Irish Republican Prisoners’ Welfare Association (IRPWA) said: “Republican  political prisioners will not be drawn into a situation which is all process and no progress even if it is chaired by an independent body such as ICRC.” Connla Young, The Irish News. For the oranginal story.

Posted from WordPress for Android

END THE ILLEGAL INTERNMENT OF MARTIN COREY NOW !!!!

1049037_169646199880766_1341835053_o

Stiofán Mac Óda

Today, September 2, 2013, is the 63rd birthday of Martin Corey.

Today is also the date the Parole Commissioners were to commence Martin’s annual Parole hearing. We received communication on Friday, the 30th of August, informing us that this open hearing to review Martin’s ongoing detention would NOT commence on this date, with no alternative date being suggested or discussed with us.

Martin is entitled by law to an annual Parole hearing, and yet he has NOT received one in over TWO YEARS. A variety of reasons have been given for the delay, including blaming Martin himself for his “legal challenges” against his detention under Article 5 (4) (the right to have a court decide the lawfulness of his detention under the European convention of Human Rights).

Recent violations of Human Rights in the Middle East have received worldwide condemnation, including by the British government who stated “they will continue to play an active and forthright role in international institutions that promote and protect human rights.” They also emphasised the UK’s own commitment to strengthen human rights, both domestically and internationally.

The European Court of Human Rights ruled in 2012 that it was unacceptable to deny an annual parole hearing to anyone held in custody. This ruling followed a case of a man who waited 14 months for a parole hearing. Martin Corey has now waited 25 MONTHS.

The Secretary of State in a recent communication stated, “an individual who served a life sentence can be returned to prison if they pose a risk to the public or commits further offences.” Since Martin’s arrest in April 2010, he has NEVER been charged with a crime, questioned by police regarding a crime, or given any explanation as to the risk he poses to the public.

Martin served 19 years in prison prior to his release in 1992. He has now served the equivalent of a seven year sentence since his arrest in 2010.

Martin has NOT committed any crime. He poses NO risk to the public and I am calling for his immediate release today.

I spoke with Martin this morning and he wishes to express his gratitude to those who sent messages and cards and also for their continued support in highlighting the ongoing injustice perpetrated upon him by the British government.

Jim McIlmurray

Related articles

Today, September 2nd 2013, is the 63rd Birthday of Martin Corey – RELEASE HIM NOW !!!

1184852_435293783245979_1909101532_n

James Connolly Assoc Australia

Statement received by us from Jim McIlmurray on Martin Corey‘s continuing internment. It is tragic today is Martin’s birthday and he remains indefinitely interned in Maghaberry.

Today, September 2, 2013, is the 63rd birthday of Martin Corey.

Today is also the date the Parole Commissioners were to commence Martin’s annual

Parole hearing. We received communication on Friday, the 30th of August, informing us that this open hearing to review Martin’s ongoing detention would NOT commence on this date, with no alternative date being suggested or Today, September 2, 2013, is the 63rd birthday of Martin Corey.

Today is

also the date the Parole Commissioners were to commence Martin’s annual

Parole hearing. We received communication on Friday, the 30th of

August, informing us that this open hearing to review Martin’s ongoing

detention would NOT commence on this date, with no alternative

date being suggested or discussed

with us.

Martin is entitled by law to an annual Parole hearing,

and yet he has NOT received one in over TWO YEARS. A variety of reasons

have been given for the delay, including blaming Martin himself for his

“legal challenges”

against his detention under Article 5 (4) (the right to have a court

decide the lawfulness of his detention under the European convention of

Human Rights).

Recent violations of Human Rights in the Middle

East have received worldwide condemnation, including by the British

government who stated “they will continue to play an active and

forthright role in international institutions that promote and protect

human rights.” They also emphasised the UK’s own commitment to

strengthen human rights, both domestically and internationally.

The

European Court of Human Rights ruled in 2012 that it was unacceptable

to deny an annual parole hearing to anyone held in custody. This ruling

followed a case of a man who waited 14 months for a parole hearing.

Martin Corey has now waited 25 MONTHS.

The Secretary of State in a

recent communication stated, “an individual who served a life sentence

can be returned to prison if

they pose a risk to the public or commits further offences.” Since

Martin’s arrest in April 2010, he has NEVER been charged with a crime,

questioned by police regarding a crime, or given any explanation as to

the risk he poses to the public.

Martin served 19 years in prison

prior to his release in 1992. He has now served the equivalent of a

seven year sentence since his arrest in 2010.

Martin has NOT committed any crime. He poses NO risk to the public and I am calling for his immediate release today.

I

spoke with Martin this morning and he wishes to express his gratitude

to those who sent messages and cards and also for their continued

support in highlighting the ongoing injustice perpetrated upon him by

the British government.

Jim McIlmurray with us.

Martin is entitled by law to an annual Parole hearing, and yet he has NOT received one in over TWO YEARS. A variety of reasons have been given for the delay, including blaming Martin himself for his “legal challenges” against his detention under Article 5 (4) (the right to have a court decide the lawfulness of his detention under the European convention of Human Rights).

Recent violations of Human Rights in the Middle East have received worldwide condemnation, including by the British government who stated “they will continue to play an active and forthright role in international institutions that promote and protect human rights.” They also emphasised the UK’s own commitment to strengthen human rights, both domestically and internationally.

The European Court of Human Rights ruled in 2012 that it was unacceptable to deny an annual parole hearing to anyone held in custody. This ruling followed a case of a man who waited 14 months for a parole hearing.

Martin Corey has now waited 25 MONTHS.

The Secretary of State in a

recent communication stated, “an individual who served a life sentence can be returned to prison ifthey pose a risk to the public or commits further offences.”

Since Martin’s arrest in April 2010, he has NEVER been charged with a crime, questioned by police regarding a crime, or given any explanation as to the risk he poses to the public.

Martin served 19 years in prison

prior to his release in 1992. He has now served the equivalent of a seven year sentence since his arrest in 2010.

Martin has NOT committed any crime. He poses NO risk to the public and I am calling for his immediate release today.

I spoke with Martin this morning and he wishes to express his gratitude to those who sent messages and cards and also for their continued support in highlighting the ongoing injustice perpetrated upon him by the British government.

Jim McIlmurray

Related articles

Revealed: Britain sold nerve gas chemicals to Syria 10 months after war began.

l1170687_209119509249294_1344882856_n

BRITAIN allowed firms to sell chemicals to Syria capable of being used to make nerve gas, we can reveal today.

Export licences for potassium fluoride and sodium fluoride were granted months after the bloody civil war in the Middle East began.

The chemical is capable of being used to make weapons such as sarin, thought to be the nerve gas used in the attack on a rebel-held Damascus suburb which killed nearly 1500 people, including 426 children, 10 days ago.

President Bashar Assad’s forces have been blamed for the attack, leading to calls for an armed response from the West.

British MPs voted against joining America in a strike. But last night, President Barack Obama said he will seek the approval of Congress to take military action.

The chemical export licences were granted by Business Secretary Vince Cable’s Department for

Business, Innovation and Skills last January – 10 months after the Syrian uprising began.

They were only revoked six months later, when the European Union imposed tough sanctions on Assad’s regime.

Yesterday, politicians and anti-arms trade campaigners urged Prime Minister David Cameron to explain why the licences were granted.

Dunfermline and West Fife Labour MP Thomas Docherty, who sits on the House of Commons’ Committees on Arms Export Controls, plans to lodge Parliamentary questions tomorrow and write to Cable.

He said: “At best it has been negligent and at worst reckless to export material that could have been used to create chemical weapons.

“MPs will be horrified and furious that the UK Government has been allowing the sale of these

ingredients to Syria.

“What the hell were they doing granting a licence in the first place?

“I would like to know what investigations have been carried out to establish if any of this

material exported to Syria was subsequently used in the attacks on its own people.”

The SNP’s leader at Westminster, Angus Robertson MP, said: “I will be raising this in Parliament as soon as possible to find out what examination the UK Government made of where these chemicals were going and what they were to be used for.

“Approving the sale of chemicals which can be converted into lethal weapons during a civil war is a very serious issue.

“We need to know who these chemicals were sold to, why they were sold, and whether the UK Government were aware that the chemicals could potentially be used for chemical weapons.

“The ongoing humanitarian crisis in Syria makes a full explanation around these shady deals even more important.”

Mark Bitel of the Campaign Against Arms Trade (Scotland) said: “The UK Government claims to have an ethical policy on arms exports, but when it comes down to practice the reality is very different.

“The Government is hypocritical to talk about chemical weapons if it’s granting licences to companies to export to regimes such as Syria.

“We saw David Cameron, in the wake of the Arab Spring, rushing off to the Middle East with arms companies to promote business.”

Some details emerged in July of the UK’s sale of the chemicals to Syria but the crucial dates of the exports were withheld.

The Government have refused to identify the licence holders or say whether the licences were issued to one or two companies.

The chemicals are in powder form and highly toxic. The licences specified that they should be used for making aluminium structures such as window frames.

Professor Alastair Hay, an expert in environmental toxicology at Leeds University, said: “They have a variety of industrial uses.

“But when you’re making a nerve agent, you attach a fluoride element and that’s what gives it

its toxic properties.

“Fluoride is key to making these munitions.

“Whether these elements were used by Syria to make nerve agents is something only subsequent investigation will reveal.”

The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills said: “The UK Government operates one of the most rigorous arms export control regimes in the world.

“An export licence would not be granted where we assess there is a clear risk the goods might be used for internal repression, provoke or prolong conflict within a country, be used aggressively against another country or risk our national security.

“When circumstances change or new information comes to light, we can – and do – revoke licences where the proposed export is no longer consistent with the criteria.”

Assad’s regime have denied blame for the nerve gas attack, saying the accusations are “full of lies”. They have pointed the finger at rebels.

UN weapons inspectors investigating the atrocity left Damascus just before dawn yesterday and crossed into Lebanon after gathering evidence for four days.

They are now travelling to the Dutch HQ of the Organisation for the Prevention of Chemical Weapons.

It could take up to two weeks for the results of tests on samples taken from victims of the attack, as well as from water, soil and shrapnel, to be revealed.

On Thursday night, Cameron referred to a Joint Intelligence Committee report on Assad’s use of chemical weapons as he tried in vain to persuade MPs to back military action. The report said the regime had used chemical weapons at least 14 times since last year.

Russian president Vladimir Putin yesterday attacked America’s stance and urged Obama to show evidence to the UN that Assad’s regime was guilty.

Russia and Iran are Syria’s staunchest allies. The Russians have given arms and military backing to Assad during the civil war which has claimed more than 100,000 lives.

Putin said it would be “utter nonsense” for Syria to provoke opponents and spark military

retaliation from the West by using chemical weapons.

But the White House, backed by the French government, remain convinced of Assad’s guilt, and Obama proposes “limited, narrow” military action to punish the regime.

He has the power to order a strike, but last night said he would seek approval from Congress.

Obama called the chemical attack “an assault on human dignity” and said: “We are prepared to strike whenever we choose.”

He added: “Our capacity to execute this mission is not time-sensitive. It will be effective tomorrow, or next week, or one month from now.

“And I’m prepared to give that order.”

Some fear an attack on Syria will spark retaliation against US allies in the region, such

as Jordan, Turkey and Israel.

General Lord Dannatt, the former head of the British Army, described the Commons vote as a “victory for common sense and democracy”.

He added that the “drumbeat for war” had dwindled among the British public in recent days.

With many thanks to : Russell Findlay, Daily Record.

Related articles

Oppose Irish Apartheid – Stand up to British State Oppression

406584_387032858051868_1813141502_n

Derry Sceal

The British Injustice system today took a new turn.They now Intern people on promises of “possible” evidence. Not for them a transparent justice system with equality at the forefront but what else can we expect from a front loaded corrupt sectarian regime in a corrupt sectarian society. Silence as usual from the quislings who now accept the weighted system of British injustice unless it affects their own party members. The shouts and roars of “Political Policing” which emanate from them last only long enough for them to do their backroom deals, sort out their own and stick their heads firmly back in the sand so as not to have to answer the serious questions about the two tier society they have accepted for others but not themselves.

End Political Policing! End British Internment!End the wholly corrupt hierarchical sectarian British court system which accepts and furthers Political and religious Apartheid.

Oppose Irish Apartheid – Stand up to British State Oppression

End British Internment! Free “DD” McLaughlin

Beir Bua!! Neart le cheile

Related articles

SLAUGHTER IN SYRIA

FRESH scenes of the horrific slaughter of innocent civilians in Syria have emerged as violence in the Middle Eastern country spirals out of control.The images show tearful children sobbing over the bloodied bodies of relatives killed in another massacre carried out by forces loyal to President Bashar Assad. In the most recent atrocity it was claimed that pro-regime militia killed 12 factory workers on Thursday after forcing them off a bus in the village of Qusair. 7277050144_cec7c42f7e_b

Video footage released by Assad’s opponents showed the disfigured bodies of at least a dozen victims who were shot in the head or stomach at close range. It follows the slaughter of more than 100 civilians, including 49 children, in Houla last week. Syria’s most important ally, Russia, has again refused to support moves that could lead to foreign intervention.

Last Thursday, a Syrian goverernment investigation into the killings blamed armed rebel groups seeking to trigger foreign military interventon. The claim was dismissed by US permanent representative to the UN, Susan Rice, as a ” BLATANT LIE ” !

Related articles

!!……THINK-THANK “Past History will always be recorded, although there are groups of dirty hands who want to remove it”

!!……THINK-THANK
“Past History will always be recorded, although there are groups of dirty hands who want to remove it”Currently, Jewish, thought to be descendants of the sons of Israel who rejected Jesus and Muhammad, (may the mercy and the Prophet’s well-being bestowed upon them),
where the rejection continues to this day, divided into two groups: the #Sephardim and the #Ashkenazim.
The number of Ashkenazim far more than the Sephardim.
Their origins are very different from each other.@ The Sephardim,
in general is that since time immemorial Jews have lived in North Africa, Middle East and Southeast Europe.
And at a time they also lived in Spain at the time of Muslim rule there (711 AD-1609 AD),
but they were destroyed or forced to flee during the occupation
of the Christian Trinity in 1492 ADAfter this there is really no longer the Sephardim who lived in Spain, and many of those living in North Africa,
Middle East and Southeast Europe known as the Jews
who came from Spain or the offspring is not a descendant of Jews who lived in the area above since the days of Moses and Jesus,
or in the past of the tribe of Israel.@ Facts of history
It is obvious that the original of the ‘Jewish Spain’ are people
who migrated from southeastern Europe, the Middle East and North Africa during the Muslim rule in Spain,
but as we shall see later, Insha-Allah!!the possibility of some Jews from Spain is not the Sephardic immigrants from the east, but Ashknazi Jews from the North. Since then the Jews known as the Jewish Ashknazi not a descendant of Israel,
but the descendants of the ‘Jewish Spain’ instead of Sephardic Jews, although at this time they were known by that name.@ The Ashkenazi
in general is a Jew from the eighth century onwards in Europe and last lived in America. There is no denying that Ashkenazi Jews are not descendants of the original children of Israel. Arthur Koestler called them, ‘the sons of the thirteen’ in his book

In short, Ashkenazi story is as follows:
# The period of the undecided

In the seventh century A.D. Turky there are tribes who are rich and have great power in the Dead Sea and the Caspian Sea. They are surrounded by Christian Europe from the north, and by Muslims from the south. To maintain the security of their empire, and for reasons of political wisdom and not merely religious reasons, their leaders decided that the whole tribe should Khazar converts to Judaism, on the grounds of Christian Europe will not bother them if they worship God, so did the Muslims will treat them as ‘scribes’, and also will not bother them.

Other reasons
if they choose Christian or Muslim, they would be involved in the dispute existing between Christian Europe and Muslim-Jewish
so Choose is the safest way for them.

* Author Michael Rice: origin and history of the descendants of #Khazars in his book False, the following sentence

@ The Khazar:
One of the Turkish tribes who moved westwards as a consequence of the enormous pressure in #Asia,
begins with the settling in the northern kingdom of #Byzantine,
in the mid-first millennium AD century.
Their arrival caused by the Mongol invasion.
Khazar first appeared in southern #Russia,
in the region between 3Caucasus, #Don and #Volga,
then they begin to show the nature nomaden and
“start trying to get positions in government”

#Khazars, these tribes live in prosperity.
As a result, #Byzantine and #Muslim kingdom became interested in them and in fact it is not easy for one another to make this power Communicated.
Both #Christian Europe and Muslim alike are pressing the heathen (Khazar) to accept the teachings of their religion,
each of which believed that “they were the most true religion”

@ Existing conditions
The Khazars are known as people who are good, very worried about the existing conditions so that they do not choose one of the good #Faith of Christian Europe and Muslim.
Because if they choose one of these great powers,
meaning they will alienate the other forces.
So the Khazars began looking for a solution to solve this problem. The solution is to embrace the #Jewish religion in the hope of avoiding pressure from both their great strength.

Khazar conduct in-depth study of religion if that is acceptable to both Christian and Muslim great power as a respectable religion in which this issue is written in the Contact Khazar.
Correspondence in the Khazars was reported that the Muslim envoy who came to them to change their religion to Islam,
(Khazar) they ask questions, ‘

@ Guilty Quiz From #Khazar
– Khazar: Which religion you more respect, Jewish or Christian?
– Muslim: Without hesitating to answer Muslim, Judaism!!
Instead they asked the Byzantine,
that promotes orthodox Christianity,
-Khazar: ‘Religion is more appreciated where you are, Jew or Muslim?
-Christians: The Christians at once replied, ‘Jew’.
Hence the decision to be made
and officially became the Jewish Khazars.

@ Faith is false
Therefore, in a relatively short time, the entire Khazar becomes Jewish, although none of their ancestors who once lived in the holy land, and none of them are derived from the descendants of the sons of Israel who received the teachings of Moses directly.

Contradictory:
It is clear that the Jews of Europe was never able to acknowledge that they have Jewish lineage to ever live in or around the holy land. They actually have the same position with the Christians of Europe, who converted to Christianity because the religion and the observance of religion, but not the Christian descendants of the sons of Israel who have lived in or around the holy land.

Furthermore, as usual Christianity in Europe is very far from the original teachings of Jesus, so are religions embraced by the Khazar Jews are not the original teachings of Moses.

From Me as FB Family:
We must continue to explore truth and history are not yet on
the surface according to the (public).
The world to see exactly who is Jewish or False?

You can open a variety of online literature or history books that are still stored in the vault of state power.

*Read, Think and Action!!

WITH MANY THANKS TO :  bob.bay
Related articles
%d bloggers like this: